Intro to Law

Click here for Exam 1 Notes:
Exam 1 Notes

Week 9: The Paralegal Profession


9.1 California’s Paralegal Law and What Paralegals do

A Paralegal is a person, qualified through education, training or work experience to perform substantive legal work that requires knowledge of legal concepts and is customarily, but not exclusively, performed by a lawyer. This person may be retained or employed by a lawyer, law office, governmental agency or other entity or may be authorized by administrative, statutory or court authority to perform this work. Substantive shall mean work requiring recognition, evaluation, organization, analysis, and communication of relevant facts and legal concepts.
—Source: National Federation of Paralegal Associations, NFPA
 
California Business and Professions Code, Section 6450 (became effective in 2000; grandfathering clause expired in 2004):
6450 (a) "Paralegal" means a person who holds himself or herself out to be a paralegal, who is qualified by education, training, or work experience, who either contracts with or is employed by an attorney, law firm, corporation, governmental agency, or other entity, and who performs substantial legal work under the direction and supervision of an active member of the State Bar of California, as defined in Section 6060, or an attorney practicing law in the federal courts of this state, that has been specifically delegated by the attorney to him or her.
Note: This law goes on to explain the educational requirements which must be met before someone may utilize the title of “paralegal.” Completing the Evergreen Valley College Legal Assistant/Paralegal program with a Certificate, A.A., or A.S. allows you to comply with these educational requirements.

Tasks performed by a paralegal include, but are not limited to:

  • case planning, development, and management
  • legal research
  • interviewing clients
  • fact gathering and retrieving information
  • drafting and analyzing legal documents
  • representing clients before a state or federal administrative agency if that representation is permitted by statute, court rule, or administrative rule or regulation
  • collecting, compiling, and utilizing technical information to make an independent decision and recommendation to supervising attorney

What can paralegals do? (Source: American Bar Association)

  • Paralegals perform substantive legal work that would otherwise be done by attorneys. Clerical work is not substantive legal work.
  • Paralegals can be delegated any task normally performed by a lawyer, as long as the lawyer supervises the work, except those forbidden by law.
  • For example, paralegals can review and organize client files, conduct factual and legal research, prepare documents for legal transactions, draft pleadings and discovery notices, interview clients and witnesses, and assist at closings and trials.
  • Paralegals must avoid the unauthorized practice of law. Generally, paralegals may not represent clients in court, take depositions, or sign pleadings. Some federal and state administrative agencies, however, do permit nonlawyer practice (the Social Security Administration is an example).
  • Paralegals may not establish the attorney's relationship with the client or set fees to be charged and may not give legal advice to a client.
 

Week 10: Legal Careers and Resume


  1. Video: Interviewing for a Paralegal position
 
5 Ways to Respond to Ageism in a Job Interview
by Rebecca Zucker
August 02, 2019
If you are concerned about ageism, employ these strategies to help make age a nonissue in your interviews:
  • Lead with energy instead of experience. Show your excitement about the opportunity and the work you do. Anita credits her success in her job search to her passion, which her boss still talks about. Instead of discussing how many years of experience you have, or how many times you’ve done a certain type of project, show your enthusiasm for the job by saying something like, “This is my sweet spot. This is the work I love to do.” Calling out all of your years of experience (no matter how valid or meaningful) can have the unintended consequence of alienating or intimidating your interviewer, or making you appear to be a know-it-all.
  • Adopt a consulting mindset. Approach your interviews as consulting conversations, showing curiosity and a learning mindset. Use good open-ended questions, combined with engaged listening, to better understand the organization’s context and unique challenges to identify where and how you can most add value. This approach will not only be more compelling but also will help you show up more confidently, as you elevate yourself to being a peer of your interviewer. The mindset shift is part of how you can change the perceived power dynamic from you really wanting or needing the job to you having the solution or know-how that the company needs.
  • Demonstrate humility and a nonhierarchical approach. Lauren attributes her success in her interviews to showing genuine humility and demonstrating an egalitarian approach in collaborating with others. She demonstrated this by asking questions like, “Where do you want to take advantage of the brilliant work the team has already done, and where do you think it might be time for a slightly different approach?” She also made a point to talk about “supporting teams” versus “running teams” and was sure to give credit to the people doing the work. Given that collaboration is the norm for Millennials, anything that signals a hierarchical style, like asking about title or span of control, is a red flag about one’s ability to fit into a culture where the work is co-created.
  • Connect with your interviewer. Research shows that starting with warmth is an effective way to influence others. This can be as simple as a smile. In finding ways to connect personally with her interviewer, Lauren made sure to use current references that a younger person could relate to, like a popular show on Netflix. Humor is another way to connect and show the other person you’d be enjoyable to work with. However, do not use dated references or self-deprecating humor like “that was pre-internet” or “that was probably before your time.” It’s uncomfortable and alienating.
  • Show your ability to work well with diverse groups of people. Anita illustrated this by giving examples of projects she led across multiple functions, geographies, and levels of leadership, including new managers. In doing so, she conveyed her ability to work well with younger colleagues, without needing to specifically highlight age. Similarly, Lauren conveyed that her intent was to take advantage of people’s different experiences, and gave examples of working well with people from the military who were having their first experience in the private sector. This example showed she could collaborate with younger people who had a different set of experiences without calling attention to age.
  • Look the part. Fitting in with a younger crowd doesn’t mean you need to wear a hoodie or look like everyone else. You should feel comfortable and authentic while being consistent with the culture. If necessary, get help in refreshing your wardrobe and accessories. Many department stores offer styling services for free. Anita brought her 26-year-old daughter shopping and bought a few outfits and some jewelry that were stylish and versatile for a range of companies. Another client got new, fashionable frames for her eyeglasses, which she wore to the interview so that she wouldn’t have to take her readers out.
  • Reframe any inappropriate comments or questions. In Sanjiv’s case, he could have reframed the board member’s desire for “younger minds” by saying, “I think what you are really looking for is innovative thinking. I’d love to share some of my ideas that could help this organization amplify its impact and be a model for others in the field.” When asked if she would be OK with the late-night parties and drinking, Anita kept it brief and said, “I love to celebrate success with my team,” and then refocused the conversation elsewhere. If you’re unsure how to respond to an inappropriate comment or question, respond with curiosity, asking something like, “Can you say more about that?” or “Can you share more about what you’re hoping to learn, so I can address your underlying concern?”
  • While ageism exists, focusing on what you can control and employing the strategies above can divert attention from your age and refocus it on why you are right for the job.

Week 11: Legal Ethics


11.1 Overview of Paralegal Ethics

History of Paralegal Ethics

  • The legal profession became serious about ethics after the Watergate scandal in the 1970’s (almost everyone involved was a lawyer).
  • The paralegal profession has grown, its ethical guidelines have improved also. Professional associations for paralegals.
  • Guidelines for the utilization of paralegal services
  • Ethics guidelines promulgated by paralegal associations
  • The liability of paralegals and the lawyers who supervise them

Sanctions for attorneys

  • Disbarment: Rescinding of a lawyer’s license to practice
  • Suspension: Attorney is deprived of the right to practice law for a specified period of time
  • Probation: Attorney can practice, but certain requirements must be met
  • Reprimand (or reproval): Warning that ethical violations have occurred and will not be tolerated

Professional Paralegal Professional

  • NFPA (National Federation of Paralegal Associations)
  • NALA (National Association of Legal Assistants)
  • California Alliance of Paralegal Associations (and local groups)
  • California Association of Legal Document Assistants (CALDA) (LDA’s were formerly known as Independent Paralegals…visit www.calda.org for more info)

Legal Document Assistants (LDAs)

Non-lawyers who are authorized to assist members of the public in representing themselves, but who are not permitted to give legal advice or represent clients in court

Confidentiality

Confidentiality involves two separate, but related, issues: the duty of confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege.
  1. Duty of Confidentiality: Paralegals, like attorneys, have a duty of confidentiality to the client. This is an affirmative duty that paralegals are bound to uphold.
    1. Ethical Guideline: A paralegal shall preserve all confidential information provided by the client or acquired from other sources before, during, and after the professional relationship. (NFPA Model Code)
  1. Attorney-Client Privilege
    1. Communications between an attorney and client are also subject to a privilege (a privilege operates like a defense), when another party seeks disclosure of information that should be confidential).
      1. Rationale: The privilege exists to encourage people to seek out legal advice and be honest/truthful without other parties being able to access this information. Paralegals, because they assist attorneys in providing legal assistance to clients, should be covered by the privilege also.

Conflicts of Interest

Rules concerning conflicts of interest are designed to protect the client's interest. The foundation for conflicts of interest rules is the legal professional's responsibility to maintain client confidence and the legal professional's duty of loyalty to client interests. Conflicts can arise in a variety of settings, often involving a new job, personal relationships, or business interests
 
From NALA Model Guidelines, Comment section:
“The legal assistant (paralegal) must take any and all steps necessary to prevent conflicts of interest and fully disclose such conflicts to the supervising attorney. Failure to do so may jeopardize both the attorney's representation of the client and the case itself.” Ethical walls and client waivers are two common ways to address conflicts.

Preventing and Addressing Conflicts

The foundation for conflicts of interest rules is the legal professional's responsibility to maintain client confidence and the legal professional's duty of loyalty to client interests. Conflicts can arise in a variety of settings, often involving a new job, personal relationships, or business interests

11.2 Legal Ethics: Class Material

I. Development of Legal & Paralegal Ethics

A. Modern legal ethics went through big changes in the 1970s.
The Watergate Scandal was a big embarrassment for the legal profession because President Nixon and most of the people charged in the scandal were lawyers.
  • Before Watergate, the American Bar Association had been using a set of ethical guidelines called the Canons of Professional Ethics, which broadly appealed to the morality of attorneys with advice such as “a lawyer will find his highest honor in a deserved reputation for fidelity to private trust and to public duty, as an honest man and as a patriotic and loyal citizen.” There was little in the way of actual rules or enforcement.
  • Following Watergate, the ABA created its Model Code of Professional Responsibility (which has now become the Model Rules of Professional Conduct), which contained specific rules designed to uphold a minimum standard of professional conduct.
  • Law schools were also required to add legal ethics classes after Watergate and by the early 1980s, many states required law school graduates to complete professional responsibility testing.
  • Today, each state has its own rules based on the ABA’s Model Rules, and lawyers can be severely sanctioned and disbarred for failing to comply with them.
B. Ethics for Paralegals
  1. Paralegal standards: As the paralegal profession has continued to grow and develop in terms of independence and professionalism, the national organizations (NFPA and NALA) have worked with bar associations to develop model rules and guidelines for paralegal ethics.
  1. Sources of Rules and Guidelines -- National Federation of Paralegal Associations (NFPA): Model Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility and Guidelines for Enforcement http://www.paralegals.org
      • National Association of Legal Assistants (NALA): Model Standards and Guidelines for Utilization of Legal Assistants (including ethical guidelines) http://www.nala.org

II. Confidentiality involves two separate, but related, issues:

  1. The duty of Confidentiality
    1. Paralegals, like attorneys, have a duty of confidentiality to the client. This is an affirmative duty that paralegals are bound to uphold.
    2. From NFPA Model Code: 1.5 A PARALEGAL SHALL PRESERVE ALL CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT OR ACQUIRED FROM OTHER SOURCES BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER THE COURSE OF THE PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP.
  1. Attorney-client Privilege.
    1. Communications between an attorney and client are also subject to a privilege (a privilege operates like a defense), when another party seeks disclosure of information that should be confidential). The privilege exists to encourage people to seek out legal advice, and it operates to prevent other parties from obtaining disclosure of information that the client has shared with the attorney. Paralegals, because they assist attorneys in providing legal assistance to clients, should be covered by the privilege also. (Hypothetical Problems at end of this packet)
 
Sample Scenario: The Hit-and-Run: Sherissa is a paralegal at the public defender’s office. One day, her phone rings and it is a former client of hers. He tells Sherissa over the phone that he caused a hit and run accident and is calling her from a phone booth a few miles down the highway. He then tells her he has to leave and hangs up. The victim of the accident wants to sue but does not know the name of the other driver. Her legal team gets the phone booth call traced to Sherissa’s office. Sherissa is served with a subpoena from the court to be questioned about the identity of the caller. Can she be forced to reveal the client’s identity?

III. Conflicts of Interest (portions of this summary are courtesy of Illinois Paralegal Association)

  • Rules concerning conflicts of interest are designed to protect the client's interest. The foundation for conflicts of interest rules is the legal professional's responsibility to maintain client confidence and the legal professional's duty of loyalty to client interests.
  • While conflicts of interest can arise in a variety of settings, conflict of interest problems involving the paralegal most notably arise in the context of the former client. The consequences of a former client conflict involving the paralegal can prove devastating for both the client and the law firm. Most significantly, the law firm by which the paralegal is employed may be disqualified from representing the client.
  • The most highly publicized of such cases occurred in California and is documented in In re Complex Asbestos Litigation, 232 Cal. App. 3d 572, 283 Cal. Rptr. 732 (1991). In this case, a law firm was disqualified from representing several clients, plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, because the attorney had hired a paralegal previously employed by the firm representing the defendants in the same litigation. In reaching its holding, the court explained, "hiring a former employee of opposing counsel is not, in and of itself, sufficient to warrant disqualification of an attorney or law firm.
  • However, when the former employee possesses confidential attorney-client information, materially related to pending litigation, the situation implicates ... considerations of ethics which run to the very integrity of our judicial process." Complex Asbestos, 232 Cal. App. 3d at, 283 Cal. Rptr. at 744. Therefore, because the consequences of a conflict can be so great, the paralegal must maintain a record-keeping system that tracks potential situations involving conflicts of interest.
  • When a potential problem presents itself, the paralegal should advise the supervising attorney. Disqualification of the law firm may be avoided when proper procedures are in place that protect the confidentiality and loyalty owed to the client. Other kinds of conflict of interest problems involving the paralegal's personal or business interests might also arise, but may be cured where, upon being notified of the potential conflict, the client consents and the supervising attorney reasonably believes that the work will not adversely affect the paralegal's relationship with the client. Therefore, the paralegal should do such things as entering into a business transaction with a client only with caution. Perhaps the best course of action to follow is to avoid the possibility of a future conflict altogether.
  • Conflict of interest rules are of special significance for the freelance paralegal. The freelance paralegal works for a number of attorneys, associated with different law firms, who represent different clients. Often, freelance paralegals find themselves doing a great deal of work in a particular area of law because they have developed a certain expertise. Therefore, the very nature of the freelance paralegal's work means that the prospect of a former client conflict arising is great. The freelance paralegal must take additional measures to avoid a conflict.
  • From NALA Model Guidelines, Comment section: “The legal assistant must take any and all steps necessary to prevent conflicts of interest and fully disclose such conflicts to the supervising attorney. Failure to do so may jeopardize both the attorney's representation of the client and the case itself.”
  • California Alliance of Paralegal Associations, Ethics Guidelines 7: “A paralegal shall avoid conflicts of interest and immediately disclose in writing any potential conflicts.” (*Note: This is substantially similar to the NFPA’s guideline on conflicts) HOW DOES A PARALEGAL KNOW WHEN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS?
  • For paralegals who are supervised by or accountable to an attorney, the attorney is obligated to determine whether there is conflict of interest between the paralegal and the client or legal matter. In practice areas where paralegals are not supervised by or accountable to an attorney but deal directly with the clients, paralegals make those decisions.
  • Examples of when a paralegal may have a conflict of interest in a legal matter include changing jobs (as in the Asbestos case), family and close personal relationships (with party or with someone involved in the legal matter), and business/professional relationships outside the employment setting.
 
CONSTRUCTING AN ETHICAL WALL
An ethical wall (or Chinese wall, as it used to be called) is an imaginary boundary placed around an individual or individuals with whom a conflict of interest is discovered. This imaginary boundary is supposed to bar any communications, written or verbal, between the members of the legal team handling a matter and the person with whom the conflict of interest exists. Sometimes, an ethical wall can be put up around someone even if there could merely be an appearance of a conflict of interest.

IV. Unauthorized Practice of Law

Non-lawyers are forbidden from practicing law by each state. Paralegals, even those working on contract rather than as employees of a firm or an attorney, cannot perform tasks that would equate to practicing law. Under California Bus. & Prof. Code § 6450, paralegals may perform “substantial legal work under the direction and supervision of (an attorney) that has been specifically delegated by the attorney to him or her.” NALA, Model Guideline 2 Legal assistants should not:
  1. Establish attorney-client relationships; set legal fees; give legal opinions or advice; or represent a client before a court, unless authorized to do so by said court; nor
  1. Engage in, encourage, or contribute to any act which could constitute the unauthorized practice law.*
    1. *The Comment section for this Model Guideline admits there are no clear definitions of what constitutes “unauthorized practice of law” applied to paralegals. Therefore, just try to be as careful as possible to avoid any misunderstandings.
 
If you choose to become a Legal Document Assistant outside the traditional structured law environment (LDA under B&PC § 6400, formerly known as Independent Paralegal), then you will need to pass an exam that includes questions related to the boundaries of unauthorized practice. More information is available from the California Legal Dcoument Assistant Association (CALDA) at www.calda.org.  (Links to an external site.)

V. Working With Attorneys

ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.3 provides: With respect to a non-lawyer employed or retained by or associated with a lawyer: … (b) a lawyer having direct supervisory authority over the non-lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person's conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer …
When you work with attorneys, please be aware that they have primary professional responsibility for your work. Under California Bus. & Prof. Code § 6450, there is no state agency named to regulate paralegals, but attorneys are charged with certifying that you have met the requisite standards to become and continue to be a paralegal. Attorneys can potentially get in even more trouble than you can if there is a serious ethical breach. So please take the time to look over the California Rules of Professional Conduct that apply to attorneys; you can access it at the State Bar website listed above.

Hypothetical Problems

  1. The Letters: You work in the county counsel’s office. Your office represents the county transit agency, which is being sued by a former employee for age discrimination. The transit agency contends that it fired him because he was consistently late to work. In fact, the agency consulted your office before sending this employee his termination letter. As the senior legal assistant, you were asked to review the agency’s rough draft of its letter before it was sent to the employee. Your office suggested some changes to the letter for legal reasons, and you assisted in re-drafting it before the final copy was sent. You have been called by the plaintiff’s attorneys to testify as to the contents of that draft letter in its earlier form. Can you be compelled to testify?
  1. The Small Community: a husband and wife are planning to divorce. They live in a small community with a limited number of attorneys. The husband wants to prevent his wife from obtaining adequate counsel. Therefore, he visits each family law attorney in succession, shares his situation, but with no intent to hire them. He in fact already knows that he will retain Attorney A. The wife goes to one of the visited attorneys, Attorney B, seeking representation. As a paralegal with the law offices of Attorney B, one of your duties is to check client conflicts. You check the wife’s name before she comes in for her consultation with the attorney and find that your firm has already formed an attorney-client relationship with her husband. You inform the attorney, but he says that the initial consultation with the husband was provided for free, and that no form was signed. Do you think your firm can represent the wife or not?
  1. The Complaint: John has worked as a paralegal for ten years. Over the years he has gained a great deal of expertise, especially in the area of intellectual property litigation. As a result, he has an above-average salary and is trusted by his boss to handle a great deal of responsibility. Recently his boss, attorney Amanda Ruiz, asked him to draft a complaint alleging trademark infringement and negligence. He drafted the complaint, and Amanda read it and then signed it. As was customary, John then sent a copy of the complaint to the client with a cover letter explaining it. Do you think John has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law?
  1. Downtime: Minh Le is a litigation paralegal and is working on an employment discrimination case. The case is nearing trial and Minh Le has been assisting the attorney in preparing witnesses, evidence, and trial exhibits. On one particular day, Minh Le accompanies the attorney to court for a hearing on a pre-trial motion. The judge is late, and the bailiff informs them that the judge will start the hearing 45 minutes behind schedule. Minh Le has her laptop computer with her, and so she uses the time to begin drafting a motion in another case that she is working on for a different client of the firm. The attorney is talking on his cell phone to another clients for most of this time. Later, Minh Le bills the time spent in court to the second client whose motion she was writing on her computer. The attorney notices that she did not bill this time to his trial client’s case and asks her to double-bill the time spent waiting in court (once to the first client, and again to the second client). After all, he says, they were in court on the first client’s case, and so that client should pay for both of their time. Is this attorney’s suggestion appropriate? How should Minh Le handle this situation?
  1. Moonlighting? Leticia, a legal assistant at a small law firm that handles Wills & Trusts, is asked by her close friend to prepare a living trust on behalf of her mother, who also has some questions about the tax consequences. The friend offers to pay her directly. Is it appropriate for Leticia to handle this task?
 

Week 12: Utilizing Paralegals


THE IMPORTANCE OF UTILIZING PARALEGALS

By Christa Centolella (Summarized for class)
 
What is the role of a paralegal?
  • Paralegals are often hired to deal with the customer service side of the practice, often being a spokesperson for the attorney.
    • They gather all information, facts and proofs, engage in client conversations,
    • Communicate with courts and other legal firms and
    • Often provide office administration tasks.
  • Paralegals are often highly skilled individuals with specific knowledge sets to support and assist lawyers with their practice at all stages, from intake to resolution, however, they are limited in scope over what they can and cannot do on their own and in a law practice.  Often, they are given the task to assess a case at intake and collect information to help decide whether it’s a case that would require legal advice and attorney representation.
 
Why would clients hire a paralegal over a lawyer?
Most often, those that hire me, do so for
  • Notary/signing agent services, process serving, document typing, research, referrals, document preparation and
  • Getting them the right forms and other support services that do not require legal advice and cost much less to administer.
 
As an independent provider, I cannot give legal advice or represent the general public, so in such cases, they would not hire me over a lawyer.
However, I can:
  • Gather information and point someone in the right direction by giving them referrals,
  • Suggest resolutions or help them get their case facts in order better so they can hire an attorney, if needed.
 
People will often seek my assistance first because their initial motivation is that they think they will save on money and think we are cheaper in fees. That is not always the case. I get a lot of calls for legal aid services, but I don’t provide free or pro bono services. They would not hire me instead of an attorney because I am providing support services, not direct legal services. There is a big difference between the two. I am often hired by attorneys to provide administrative or certain tasks that assist them with their client’s case, not mine. I don’t have a legal practice; I have a legal support and financial practice.
Often, people possess a great amount of business and legal knowledge and decide to represent themselves (if rules allow). On those cases, they usually need a little extra manpower on tasks such as research, making sure they have the right forms and notary information, or assistance with organizing information. The only other time I think someone would hire me over an attorney would be for notary services, as you don’t have to be an attorney to be a notary public.
What aid can paralegals offer?
Having paralegals can be key to the success of every attorney’s firm whether it is a solo practice, a partner practice or a large firm. They can assist you greatly in your daily practice needs and tasks depending on your business model and area of law. Sometimes paralegal fees may be higher than traditional legal support staff, but often that comes with experience and vast knowledge of certain subjects and areas of law. You are paying for higher knowledge and skills sets. It’s the same for why someone would hire an attorney. Paralegals to attorneys are like physician assistants to doctors.
What are common misconceptions people have regarding paralegals?
I get requests I can’t fulfill and the responses I get are that they think paralegals are really the ones that do all the work. This is not generally the case. As it can be true, we do perform many types of tasks and carry a higher vast of knowledge than, for example, a legal secretary, but we don’t do all the work.  Paralegals in New York don’t carry the license to be in fiduciary duty and do not counsel on the laws and how they apply.  We are limited in scope. Usually, individuals or businesses seeking paralegals are seeking a more affordable way to get certain tasks done, usually due to budget constraints or affordability factors. They don’t realize they still should invest in getting the legal advice regarding their situation, even if the attorney does not carry out the administrative tasks.
As an independent paralegal, what advice would you offer law firms, to better utilize paralegal staff?
Paralegals are usually entrusted with certain tasks due to their performance, experience and knowledge.  You should hire those that carry knowledge sets in different areas and surround your practice with such supporting and knowledgeable individuals. The hiring attorney still takes full responsibility for the paralegal’s actions. It’s important to have good communication skills and a close relationship with your paralegal to ensure the tasks you assign are in accordance with your wishes and that they won’t jeopardize your practice and license. Attorneys also need to recognize that paralegals are their support line and should value their role and treat them well and accordingly. Often, I hear that paralegals leave a practice for the way they are treated and/or viewed. An attorney’s attitude and manners toward their support staff is of utmost importance and often is the key to a successful practice.
The reasons for when others seek an independent paralegal as opposed to the attorney is usually according to the misconception they conclude from the experiences they have encountered. If attorneys would pay close attention to the customer service provided to their clientele and not only to the income factors, they will increase their success rates. A legal practice thrives not only on its knowledge power, but word of mouth on the experiences of those who hire them.
If you’re an attorney and overwhelmed with your workload, seek a quality independent paralegal service provider to help you expand or maintain your practice duties. The benefits are: 1) that you can write off them as a vendor expense, 2) change service providers at your choice and upon need without the hiring repercussions 3) build an additional referral source for your practice that costs less than some attorney advertising models and 4) increases the ability to expand your business model efforts, if that is the direction you are seeking.
Built with Potion.so